Why is the Colorado government targeting cake artist Jack Phillips yet AGAIN? And why are they continuing their hostility toward Jack and his religious beliefs despite his recent Supreme Court victory upholding his freedom earlier this year? Read Jack’s story to find out why.

Today, your gift can have double the impact thanks to a generous Christian family offering to match each gift, dollar for dollar, up to $2 million! Right now, you can help provide a strong legal defense for Jack and others like him. Will you help now?

– Pastor Greg Young

By Alliance Defending Freedom
Article Source

Despite the Supreme Court ruling in his favor, Colorado cake artist faces new threats

You may recognize Jack Phillips. He’s the Colorado cake artist who was at the center of one of the year’s most-talked-about U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Although Jack won an important victory, the State of Colorado didn’t get the message. It is targeting him again!

How did this happen?

For six years, Jack suffered. He faced threats and government punishment simply because he runs his business according to his faith. Jack declined a request to create a wedding cake celebrating a same-sex marriage.

Jack explained that he would be happy to design a cake for the customers for a different event, or sell them anything else in his shop. But he just could not create a cake expressing messages and celebrating an event that conflicted with his deeply held religious beliefs about marriage. Still, the couple filed a complaint, and the State of Colorado punished Jack for living in accordance with his faith.

In June, the U.S. Supreme Court finally gave Jack justice when it handed down its decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Jack won in a 7-2 ruling that upheld his religious freedom.

In its decision, the Supreme Court made clear that the government had been hostile to Jack’s freedom of religion. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion that “the Commission’s hostility was inconsistent with the First Amendment’s guarantee that our laws be applied in a manner that is neutral towards religion.” The Supreme Court decision made it clear that the government must respect and show tolerance for people of faith and their religious beliefs.

But although the highest court in the land ruled to protect Jack’s freedom, he now faces a new threat from the state.

Read More…